Carpet, The Dust Mite and Asthma
In recent years we have been fed a diet of sensationalist scare stories
about carpets and dust mites and their alleged links to asthma. This
stream of anti-carpet propaganda has advised, indeed urged, you to switch to
wooden floors ostensibly 'in the interests of health'. It must be
pointed out, however, that this was an orchestrated anti-carpet campaign
that was part funded by a Swedish laminate flooring producer. Thus the
advice to 'rip up the carpet' was far from independent and impartial as
it purported to be.
The Carpet Foundation, the UK carpet manufacturing industry's lead body,
in conjunction with the European Carpet Association, GuT, the German
Association for environmentally friendly carpets, the Wool Research
Organization of New Zealand and the Carpet and Rug Institute of the USA
and Canada,
has conducted a detailed review of the key scientific papers on asthma and
floor-coverings. It proves conclusively that there is no scientific
validity for suggesting that carpet is a major threat to your health, even
those sensitive to the dust mite allergen. The main findings from this study
are as follows –
- Asthma is a very complicated condition and experts cannot agree
on any single cause for the illness. Dust mite allergen is only one of the
causes of sensitization for asthma attacks.
- The main site for dust mites to live and to thrive in UK houses
is in bedding.
- The conditions in carpet in UK homes is rarely suitable for large
populations of dust mites to survive. Temperature and humidity are
too low.
- The live dust mite does not pose a problem for asthma sufferers, but
their fecal pellets contain the allergen which, on inhalation, triggers
asthma attacks in sensitized individuals.
- The filter like properties of carpets holds allergen in the pile
and significantly limits its potential for becoming airborne again. Hard
floors allow allergen on the surface to re-circulate readily in the
atmosphere through vibrations or movement of the air.
- Fresh air ventilation together with temperature and humidity
control will significantly reduce dust mite populations and regular
vacuum cleaning (with proper dust receptacles and filters) will remove
most of the allergen load from the carpet.
- There is no scientific evidence to support the advice that the
removal of carpet is clinically beneficial to asthma sufferers. No
studies have ever been carried out which conclusively links a carpet
free environment to clinical benefits for asthma sufferers. In fact in
Sweden where health hysteria led to a 77% reduction in carpet use
between 1975 and 1990 there was an increase of more than 300% in allergic
disease over the same period.
- All materials emit gasses from V.O.C’s. (Volatile Organic Compounds) but
tests have shown that carpet emits significantly lower levels than
other indoor finishes and furnishings and as such, pose no threat to
consumers.
- On the contrary wool pile carpet absorbs common gaseous airborne
pollutants and generally improves indoor air quality. Carpet also
traps other particulate pollutants, deposited through foot traffic or
airborne settlement, holding them in the pile of the carpet, away from its
surface until they can be removed by regular, normal vacuum cleaning.
- The manufacture of carpets in the UK, the US and Canada is controlled by environmental
legislation and manufacturers recognize their responsibility towards the
environment. All process emissions have to meet stringent regulations
policed by the environment agency of that country. As with every other
industry, where new evidence points to the undesirable effects of a process
or chemical it is phased out to an agreed timescale. The carpet industry has an excellent
record of compliance and improvement.
- It can be of no surprise that a manufactured product such as carpet will
contain traces of the chemicals used in its production or the production of
its raw materials. Some are applied deliberately, such as the mothproofing
treatment Permethrin, and are essential for the carpet to be functional in
the home. Others may be a residual, by-product or contaminant from raw
material processing. In either case, the traces are minute and represent
no health hazard to the consumer whatsoever. However, the industry is
not standing still and is continually working to find processes and material
suppliers capable of reducing or eliminating even these insignificant
traces.
|